I don't need a fraud score — I need one number, per resident, that's actually right across tax, water, and fines.
Who is actually delinquent vs. billed incorrectly?
Does a resident's combined tax, water/sewer, and fine balance match across systems?
Are we tracking toward a tax sale correctly?
Can we trust the same information across every billing system?
collection-rate and county-rank figures checked against the underlying filings, not self-reported.
the platform is built to eventually reconcile tax, water, and fine balances into one number per resident -- today's release covers collection performance first.
Problem: knowing how your collection rate compares -- to your own history and to other towns -- usually means pulling numbers by hand.
How AgentGov finds it: agents track collection rate over time and against county peers, from the town's own filed figures.
Why it matters: collection rate is one of the clearest signals of whether billing and follow-up are working.
Problem: it's hard to know if your collection rate is normal for your county or a real outlier.
How AgentGov finds it: agents place a town's collection rate against its county peers so a number has context.
Why it matters: a rate that looks fine in isolation can be a real problem once it's ranked.
filed tax-collection figures come into the platform for the town and its county peers.
agents compute collection rate over time and rank it against county peers.
your office gets collection-rate and rank figures linked back to the filings they came from.
Tell us what your office is dealing with, and we'll walk through what's possible today.